The Historical Tracings of the Doctrines of Grace | Part 7
The Synod of Dort (1618–1619) – Grace Defined and Defended
Key Scriptures
The Reformation had recovered the gospel, but the Synod of Dort would preserve it.
By the end of the sixteenth century, the Dutch churches were in turmoil. The followers of Jacob Arminius had gained influence in universities, pulpits, and even political circles. The tension between the Arminians (Remonstrants) and the Calvinists (Contra-Remonstrants) had grown so severe that civil war seemed possible.
In 1618, the States-General of the Netherlands called an international assembly of pastors and theologians to settle the issue once and for all. This council, held in the city of Dordrecht (or “Dort”), gathered 84 delegates and 18 secular commissioners from across Europe—representatives from England, Scotland, Germany, Switzerland, and beyond.
Over the course of 154 sessions spanning seven months, they examined the Remonstrant teachings in light of Scripture and found them to be contrary to the gospel of grace.
What emerged from that gathering was one of the most important doctrinal statements in church history: The Canons of Dort.
The Purpose of the Synod
The Synod was not called to create a new theology but to clarify and defend what the Reformers had already taught. The goal was simple: to answer the five Arminian articles with five biblical counterpoints.
Robert Godfrey notes in Saving the Reformation, “The Synod of Dort did not give birth to Calvinism; it saved it.” Without Dort, the Reformation might have fractured into human-centered religion. With Dort, it stood firmly anchored in Scripture.
Dort’s decisions were rooted not in philosophical speculation but in the straightforward exegesis of the Word of God. The Synod proclaimed that salvation, from beginning to end, is the sovereign work of a merciful God.
The Structure of the Canons
The Canons of Dort were organized around five “heads of doctrine.” Later generations summarized them with the familiar acrostic TULIP, but the Synod’s language was far more pastoral and precise. Let’s briefly walk through each “head” as Dort originally expressed them.
The Pastoral Tone of Dort
Contrary to the caricatures of cold scholasticism, the Synod of Dort was profoundly pastoral. Each doctrine was framed not as an argument for theologians, but as comfort for believers.
Election was meant to produce humility and gratitude.
Definite atonement was meant to assure the believer of Christ’s complete sufficiency.
Irresistible grace was meant to display the power of the Spirit.
Perseverance was meant to give peace in life and death.
The Canons conclude with this beautiful line: “This same doctrine of divine election, by the guidance of the Spirit, daily affords greater occasion for humbling ourselves before God, for adoring the depth of His mercies, for cleansing ourselves, and for rendering grateful returns of ardent love to Him.”
That’s not cold Calvinism—that’s warm worship.
The Outcome and Enduring Impact
The Synod’s findings were adopted unanimously by the Reformed delegates, and the Remonstrants who refused to recant were expelled from the church. Yet the goal was never mere exclusion—it was protection. The Synod sought to preserve the purity of the gospel.
The Canons of Dort, together with the Belgic Confession and the Heidelberg Catechism, became known as the Three Forms of Unity, defining the theological backbone of the Reformed faith.
Their influence reached far beyond the Netherlands. The Westminster Assembly (1646) and the 1689 London Baptist Confession both drew heavily from Dort’s conclusions.
R.C. Sproul once said, “If there had been no Dort, there would be no Reformation today.” The Synod ensured that the church would continue to proclaim a God-centered gospel, not a man-centered one.
The Heart of Dort
Dort’s message was simple:
From beginning to end, salvation belongs to the Lord.
These truths, clarified at Dort, remain the immovable foundation of biblical Christianity. Every true church, every faithful preacher, and every redeemed sinner stands secure because of this confession: it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy.
The Reformation had rediscovered grace. Dort defined it. And from that definition flowed centuries of revival, missions, and worship rooted not in human ability but in divine sovereignty.
- Ephesians 2:8–9 – “For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast.”
- Romans 9:15–16 – “For he says to Moses, ‘I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.’ So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy.”
- John 6:37 – “All that the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out.”
- Philippians 1:6 – “He who began a good work in you will bring it to completion at the day of Jesus Christ.”
The Reformation had recovered the gospel, but the Synod of Dort would preserve it.
By the end of the sixteenth century, the Dutch churches were in turmoil. The followers of Jacob Arminius had gained influence in universities, pulpits, and even political circles. The tension between the Arminians (Remonstrants) and the Calvinists (Contra-Remonstrants) had grown so severe that civil war seemed possible.
In 1618, the States-General of the Netherlands called an international assembly of pastors and theologians to settle the issue once and for all. This council, held in the city of Dordrecht (or “Dort”), gathered 84 delegates and 18 secular commissioners from across Europe—representatives from England, Scotland, Germany, Switzerland, and beyond.
Over the course of 154 sessions spanning seven months, they examined the Remonstrant teachings in light of Scripture and found them to be contrary to the gospel of grace.
What emerged from that gathering was one of the most important doctrinal statements in church history: The Canons of Dort.
The Purpose of the Synod
The Synod was not called to create a new theology but to clarify and defend what the Reformers had already taught. The goal was simple: to answer the five Arminian articles with five biblical counterpoints.
Robert Godfrey notes in Saving the Reformation, “The Synod of Dort did not give birth to Calvinism; it saved it.” Without Dort, the Reformation might have fractured into human-centered religion. With Dort, it stood firmly anchored in Scripture.
Dort’s decisions were rooted not in philosophical speculation but in the straightforward exegesis of the Word of God. The Synod proclaimed that salvation, from beginning to end, is the sovereign work of a merciful God.
The Structure of the Canons
The Canons of Dort were organized around five “heads of doctrine.” Later generations summarized them with the familiar acrostic TULIP, but the Synod’s language was far more pastoral and precise. Let’s briefly walk through each “head” as Dort originally expressed them.
Head I – Divine Election and Reprobation
The first head affirmed that God’s election is unconditional, eternal, and rooted in His sovereign good pleasure. God chose, before the foundation of the world, a definite number of individuals to be saved in Christ.
The Synod declared, “Election is the unchangeable purpose of God whereby, before the foundation of the world, He has out of the whole human race chosen a certain number of persons to redemption in Christ.”
This truth safeguarded the doctrine of grace from any idea that God’s choice depends on foreseen faith or human effort. Romans 9:16 was central: “It depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy.”
The Synod also confessed the corresponding doctrine of reprobation—not that God causes sin, but that He passes over some, leaving them in their rebellion to demonstrate His justice.
Far from cold fatalism, Dort saw election as the warm heart of the gospel. It gives assurance, because it roots salvation in God’s unchanging will rather than in man’s unstable faith.
Head II – The Death of Christ and the Redemption of Men Thereby
Here, the Synod affirmed the definite, effectual nature of the atonement. Christ’s death, they said, was of infinite worth and sufficient for all, but efficient only for the elect.
Dort wrote, “It was the will of God that Christ through the blood of the cross should effectually redeem out of every people, tribe, nation, and language all those, and those only, who were from eternity chosen to salvation.”
The Arminians taught that Christ made salvation possible. Dort responded that Christ made salvation actual. When Jesus died, He truly paid for the sins of His people. His cross did not merely offer forgiveness; it purchased it.
This head preserved the glory of the cross as a finished, successful work. As Jesus said, “It is finished” (John 19:30).
Head III/IV – Human Corruption and Conversion to God
(These two heads were combined in the final version of the Canons.)
Here, Dort affirmed both the depth of man’s fall and the power of God’s grace. The Synod declared that man is born “dead in sin, blind in mind, corrupt in heart, and enslaved in will.” Only the regenerating power of the Holy Spirit can bring a sinner to life.
The Canons read, “This grace of regeneration does not treat men as senseless stocks and blocks, nor take away the will and its properties, but spiritually quickens, heals, corrects, and at the same time sweetly and powerfully bends it.”
That is a beautiful description of irresistible grace—God’s Spirit drawing the sinner not by force, but by transforming desire.
John 6:37 sums it up: “All that the Father gives me will come to me.” The grace of God does not merely invite; it accomplishes.
Head V – The Perseverance of the Saints
Finally, the Synod declared that those whom God calls and justifies, He also preserves unto the end. Grace that saves is grace that keeps.
Dort wrote, “Whom God calls according to His purpose, He does not permit to fall from grace and finally perish, but He continues to work in them by His Spirit unto perseverance.”
Philippians 1:6 captures the doctrine perfectly: “He who began a good work in you will bring it to completion.”
This head of doctrine provided deep assurance to believers who struggled with doubt and temptation. Perseverance is not our grip on God—it is His grip on us.
The Pastoral Tone of Dort
Contrary to the caricatures of cold scholasticism, the Synod of Dort was profoundly pastoral. Each doctrine was framed not as an argument for theologians, but as comfort for believers.
Election was meant to produce humility and gratitude.
Definite atonement was meant to assure the believer of Christ’s complete sufficiency.
Irresistible grace was meant to display the power of the Spirit.
Perseverance was meant to give peace in life and death.
The Canons conclude with this beautiful line: “This same doctrine of divine election, by the guidance of the Spirit, daily affords greater occasion for humbling ourselves before God, for adoring the depth of His mercies, for cleansing ourselves, and for rendering grateful returns of ardent love to Him.”
That’s not cold Calvinism—that’s warm worship.
The Outcome and Enduring Impact
The Synod’s findings were adopted unanimously by the Reformed delegates, and the Remonstrants who refused to recant were expelled from the church. Yet the goal was never mere exclusion—it was protection. The Synod sought to preserve the purity of the gospel.
The Canons of Dort, together with the Belgic Confession and the Heidelberg Catechism, became known as the Three Forms of Unity, defining the theological backbone of the Reformed faith.
Their influence reached far beyond the Netherlands. The Westminster Assembly (1646) and the 1689 London Baptist Confession both drew heavily from Dort’s conclusions.
R.C. Sproul once said, “If there had been no Dort, there would be no Reformation today.” The Synod ensured that the church would continue to proclaim a God-centered gospel, not a man-centered one.
The Heart of Dort
Dort’s message was simple:
- God elects according to His will
- Christ redeems according to His purpose
- The Spirit regenerates according to His power
- And the saints persevere according to His promise
From beginning to end, salvation belongs to the Lord.
These truths, clarified at Dort, remain the immovable foundation of biblical Christianity. Every true church, every faithful preacher, and every redeemed sinner stands secure because of this confession: it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy.
The Reformation had rediscovered grace. Dort defined it. And from that definition flowed centuries of revival, missions, and worship rooted not in human ability but in divine sovereignty.
Recent
The Historical Tracings of the Doctrines of Grace | Part 7
November 10th, 2025
The Historical Tracings of the Doctrines of Grace | Part 6
November 8th, 2025
The Historical Tracings of the Doctrines of Grace | Part 5
November 6th, 2025
The Historical Tracings of the Doctrines of Grace | Part 4
November 5th, 2025
The Historical Tracings of the Doctrines of Grace | Part 3
November 3rd, 2025
Archive
2025
July
Psalm 63: A Hymn in the WildernessPraise Before the Wilderness: The Song of the Redeemed | Exodus 15Three Days to Grumbling: The Temptation of Forgetfulness | Exodus 15Bitter Made Sweet: The Cross in the Wilderness | Exodus 15Tested and Healed: The Call to Obedient Trust | Exodus 15Walking in the Light | Psalm 119:105-112Twelve Springs and Seventy Palms: God’s Providence in the Journey | Exodus 15The Heart That Grumbles | Exodus 16Daily Bread & Divine Tests | Exodus 16The Bread That Came Down | Exodus 16Don’t Hoard the Manna | Exodus 16A Jar of Manna | Exodus 16Manna & The Sabbath | Exodus 16If Anyone Is In Christ | Baptism & The New CreationThe Old Has Passed Away | Baptism & The New CreationBehold the New Has Come | Baptism & The New CreationWhen the Lord Leads You to Dry Ground | Exodus 17:1-7The Heart That Fails The Test | Exodus 17:1-7The God Who Stands on the Rock | Exodus 17:1-7Massah & Meribah | Exodus 17:1-7
August
Christ, the Rock That Was Struck | Exodus 17:1-7God Uses Trials to Build Endurance | James 1Endurance Leads To Spiritual Maturity | James 1God Gives Wisdom to Those Who Ask in Faith | James 1Faith Is Not Double-Minded | James 1God Levels the Ground: How Trials Humble the Proud and Exalt the Lowly | James 1Blessed Is the One Who Remains Steadfast Under Trial | James 1God Does Not Tempt Anyone | James 1Trials, Temptations, and the Source of Sin | James 1Every Good and Perfect Gift Comes from Above | James 1Born by the Word of Truth | James 1A Bridegroom of Blood: Moses, Zipporah, and the Unequally Yoked Home | Exodus 18 StudyThe Marks of a True Believer | James 1:19-27Desire Before Doing | James 1:19-27Be Doers of the Word, Not Hearers Only | James 1:19-27True Religion & The Tongue | James 1:19-27Pure and Undefiled Religion | James 1:19-27Children of the Covenant—or Just Children? | Exodus 18 StudyWhy We Don't Play On SundaysFaith and Favoritism Cannot Coexist | James 2:1-13The Sin Beneath the Surface | James 2:1-13The Riches of True Faith | James 2:1-13The Royal Law & the Unity of God’s Commands | James 2:1-13Mercy Triumphs Over Judgment | James 2:1-13Sanctifying the Household | Exodus 18 Study
September
Does James Contradict Paul? | James 2:14-26What Is Saving Faith? | James 2:14-26Faith Without Fruit Is Dead | James 2:14-26Abraham and Rahab | James 2:14-26The Living Faith That Saves | James 2:14-26Legacy Lost and Lessons Learned | Exodus 18 StudyWhat We Do On SundaysNot Many Should Teach | James 3:1-12The Power of the Tongue to Steer the Whole Life | James 3:1-12The Tongue as a Fire | James 3:1-12Blessing and Cursing | James 3:1-12Tongue Power for God’s Glory | James 3:1-12
November
The Historical Tracings of the Doctrines of Grace | Part 2The Historical Tracings of the Doctrines of Grace | Part 3The Historical Tracings of the Doctrines of Grace | Part 4The Historical Tracings of the Doctrines of Grace | Part 5The Historical Tracings of the Doctrines of Grace | Part 6The Historical Tracings of the Doctrines of Grace | Part 7
2024
2023
January
Devoted to Teaching | Acts 2:42"All This Is From God" | 2 Corinthians 5:18Battle For The Truth | Jan HusThree Elements of Prayer Taught by King Solomon | 1 Kings 8:22-30Time To Act, Reflecting On A Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones SermonExploring 2 Corinthians 5:21Exploring Isaiah 40:7-8Sin Separates Us From God
February
March
